# 2/10 Would Not Bang

2/10 Would Not Bang is a 2012 image macro that mocks internet commenters who nitpick attractive people's photos for imaginary flaws. It started on 4chan with a Stacy Keibler picture rated 2 out of 10, and the ironic scoring format spread across Reddit, FunnyJunk and Tumblr within weeks.

## Overview
2/10 Would Not Bang is an image macro series that overlays red-text callouts onto photos of attractive people, pointing at minor or imagined flaws, capped by an ironically low rating in white text[1]. The format parodies internet commenters who pick apart strangers' looks with a straight face[2].

The layout is instantly readable: a glamour shot with red arrows or red overlay text drawing attention to minor facial details or accessory quirks, plus the white 'X/10 / Would Not Bang' verdict at the bottom[4]. The scoring stays harsh no matter how flattering the source photo is, which is the joke[1].

## How It Spread
The same day, a compilation was reposted to /r/4chan under the title '2/10 would not bang girls'[5]. On January 4th, a set of examples went up on FunnyJunk, and by January 7th the format had jumped to a Bodybuilding.com forum thread featuring the original Keibler image[4].

Coverage arrived fast. UpRoxx ran a piece on January 24th praising the meme for making fun of hypercritical beauty commenters[1], and the next day Slacktory writer Cole Stryker called it '4chan's Funniest New Meme'[2]. On January 23rd, an inverse edit of Valve co-founder Gabe Newell captioned '10/10, would bang' hit the front page of r/gaming with over 800 upvotes in under 24 hours[9].

The Huffington Post covered the spinoffs on January 26th, cataloguing 'would not eat', 'would not save' and 'would not date' variants under a 'Would Not X' snowclone[3]. By April 24th, 2012, a dedicated Facebook page had gathered 192 likes and the Tumblr tag '#would not bang' had built up its own archive of edits[4].

## How to Use
The typical build starts with a photo of a conventionally attractive person. Contributors often add red text or arrows pointing at tiny 'flaws' like an asymmetric earring or a stray strand of hair, then drop a white 'X/10 / Would Not Bang' verdict at the bottom of the frame[2]. The 'Would Not X' variant swaps 'bang' for other verbs like 'eat' or 'save' to fit non-romantic photos[3].

## Frequently Asked Questions
### What is 2/10 Would Not Bang?
2/10 Would Not Bang is a 2012 image macro that pastes an ironically low rating and red-text 'flaw' callouts onto photos of attractive people to parody hypercritical online commenters[1].

### Where did 2/10 Would Not Bang come from?
It started on January 3rd, 2012 in a 4chan /b/ thread built around a photo of wrestler Stacy Keibler[6]. The phrasing 'would not bang' first stuck on the humor site Fark in 2004[7].

### What does 2/10 Would Not Bang mean?
The label mocks the way some internet posters rate strangers' looks harshly for tiny or imagined flaws, treating a glamour shot like it has failed a checklist[2].

### How do you use 2/10 Would Not Bang?
Take a photo of an attractive person, add red text or arrows pointing at trivial 'flaws', then drop a low X/10 rating and the words 'Would Not Bang' onto the frame[2].

### Is 2/10 Would Not Bang still popular?
Peak activity ran from January to April 2012 across 4chan, Reddit, FunnyJunk and Tumblr, with mainstream write-ups from UpRoxx, Slacktory and the Huffington Post that same month[3]. It is a classic 4chan-era image macro rather than a currently active format.

## References
1. [https://uproxx.com/webculture/meme-watch-210-would-not-bang-is-here-to-help-point-out-the-flaws-you-might-have-missed/](<https://uproxx.com/webculture/meme-watch-210-would-not-bang-is-here-to-help-point-out-the-flaws-you-might-have-missed/>)
2. [https://web.archive.org/web/2012/http://www.slacktory.com/2012/01/210-would-not-bang-4chans-funniest-new-meme/](<https://web.archive.org/web/2012/http://www.slacktory.com/2012/01/210-would-not-bang-4chans-funniest-new-meme/>)
3. [https://www.huffpost.com/entry/210-would-not-bang-meme-what-else-wont-people-do_n_1235800](<https://www.huffpost.com/entry/210-would-not-bang-meme-what-else-wont-people-do_n_1235800>)
4. [https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/210-would-not-bang](<https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/210-would-not-bang>)
5. [https://www.reddit.com/r/4chan/comments/o59fs/210_would_not_bang_girls/](<https://www.reddit.com/r/4chan/comments/o59fs/210_would_not_bang_girls/>)
6. [https://web.archive.org/web/2012/http://chanarchive.org/4chan/b/126559/would-not-bang](<https://web.archive.org/web/2012/http://chanarchive.org/4chan/b/126559/would-not-bang>)
7. [https://web.archive.org/web/2004/http://www.fark.com/comments/1013236/Playboy-hottie-Carla-Harvey](<https://web.archive.org/web/2004/http://www.fark.com/comments/1013236/Playboy-hottie-Carla-Harvey>)
8. [https://web.archive.org/web/2012/http://memegenerator.net/instance/13470121](<https://web.archive.org/web/2012/http://memegenerator.net/instance/13470121>)
9. [https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/oxfw6/1010_would_bang/](<https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/oxfw6/1010_would_bang/>)

---
Source: https://meme.com/memes/210-would-not-bang
Published by meme.com — The Internet Meme Library