# The Law of Exclamation The Law of Exclamation is an internet adage holding that a statement's credibility drops as its exclamation points multiply. The rule crystallized in 2008 after FactCheck.org flagged excessive bangers as a chain-email red flag, and a Rational Wiki entry that September gave the idea a name that stuck across skeptic blogs and later Internet law roundups. ## Origin Suspicion toward multi-bang punctuation predates the law by more than a decade. In January 1997, IBM's antivirus research team published a lay-reader guide to spotting email virus hoaxes that explicitly flagged excessive exclamation points as a warning sign[4]. Later that year, IBM researcher Sarah Gordon presented a scientific paper titled 'Hoaxes and Hypes' at the 7th Virus Bulletin International Conference in San Francisco, which examined the same signals in more depth[5]. The specific 'law' formulation came together in 2008. In March of that year, FactCheck.org's Lori Robertson analyzed 31 chain emails about Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Bill Clinton, found only two contained accurate claims, and listed overuse of exclamation points among seven red flags for suspicious messages[1]. The adage was submitted to Rational Wiki as the 'Law of Exclamation' that September[6]. - **Platform:** FactCheck.org (catalyst) / Rational Wiki (named) - **Creator:** Unknown - **Date:** 2008 ## Overview Writers invoke the Law of Exclamation to dismiss chain emails, fake Facebook profiles, padded hotel reviews, and any text leaning on walls of '!!!' for authority. The core claim is simple: real reporting rarely needs five bangers in a row to make its point, so a pile of exclamation marks reads as a tell for hype, hoax, or outright fabrication[1]. The rule gets paired with other credibility checks like missing sources, blocks of ALL CAPS, and 'forward this to ten friends' instructions[1]. The adage echoes older literary advice. Novelist Elmore Leonard allowed writers only two or three exclamation points per 100,000 words of prose, a quota he laid out in a 2001 New York Times essay on his rules of writing[2]. Terry Pratchett pushed the idea into fiction across his Discworld novels, where characters who overused the mark were depicted as unstable. His 1991 book Reaper Man delivers the often-quoted line, 'Five exclamation marks, the sure sign of an insane mind'[3]. ## How to Use The law is typically invoked as a one-line dismissal when debunking a post. A common convention is to quote the suspect text, note the exclamation-point count, and link to the Rational Wiki entry[6]. Writers often apply it alongside other hoax checks rather than on its own. ## Frequently Asked Questions ### What is The Law of Exclamation? It is an internet adage stating that a statement's credibility drops as the number of exclamation points used to make it rises, usually applied to chain emails and hoax posts[6]. ### Where did The Law of Exclamation come from? The idea traces to 1997 IBM virus-hoax guides[4], gained traction after FactCheck.org's March 2008 chain-email analysis[1], and was named on Rational Wiki in September 2008[6]. ### What does The Law of Exclamation mean? In practice it means that stacking bangers like '!!!' signals hype or fabrication rather than emphasis, so readers should treat heavy exclamation point use as a reason to check the source[1]. ### How do you use The Law of Exclamation? Writers typically cite it to dismiss a suspect post, quoting the text with its exclamation count and linking the Rational Wiki entry alongside other hoax markers[6]. ### Is The Law of Exclamation still popular? It is a classic internet law listed in the same canon as Godwin's Law and Poe's Law since The Telegraph's 2009 roundup, and skeptic blogs still reference it when debunking chain content[7]. ## References 1. [https://www.factcheck.org/specialreports/that_chain_e-mail_your_friend_sent_to.html]() 2. [https://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/16/arts/writers-writing-easy-adverbs-exclamation-points-especially-hooptedoodle.html]() 3. [https://wiki.lspace.org/wiki/Multiple_exclamation_marks]() 4. [http://www.research.ibm.com/antivirus/SciPapers/Wells/HOWTOSPOT/howtospot.html]() 5. [http://www.research.ibm.com/antivirus/SciPapers/Gordon/HH.html]() 6. [https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Law_of_exclamation]() 7. [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/6408927/Internet-rules-and-laws-the-top-10-from-Godwin-to-Poe.html]() 8. [https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/the-law-of-exclamation]() 9. [https://www.slate.com/articles/life/the_good_word/2007/08/so_many_exclamation_points.html]() --- Source: https://meme.com/memes/the-law-of-exclamation Published by meme.com — The Internet Meme Library