
Maladaptive Pattern
Published October 16, 2026
On April 24th, 2021, Twitter user @AaronLinguini posted a textbook diagram contrasting a 'maladaptive pattern' of thought with 'cognitive restructuring,' picking up 209,000 likes in days. By that same week, the two-column flow chart turned into an exploitable template with Ned Flanders, Overwatch heroes, chess losses, and Dota 2 jokes plugged into the depression spiral.
Overview
Every version of the Maladaptive Pattern template keeps the same two-row flow chart intact. The top row runs from a stressor through a self-defeating thought to 'Depression,' while the bottom row shows the same stressor processed through a reframed thought that ends with 'No depression'1. Remixers overwrite one or more of the six text boxes, usually keeping the stressor consistent across both rows and only rewriting the middle thought and the outcome.
Edits lean into absurd reframings, with the 'cognitive restructuring' row insisting on wildly implausible explanations instead of acknowledging what actually happened3. Part of the appeal is the chart's deadpan clinical formatting, which gives any joke a mock-therapeutic weight. The original image also carries a typo, spelling 'restructuring' as 'rescontruction,' and most remixes preserve it as a visual signature1.
Gallery
Origin & Background
How It Spread
Timeline
2021-04-24
Twitter user @AaronLinguini posts the original 'maladaptive pattern' vs 'cognitive rescontruction' chart, drawing over 209,000 likes.
2021-04-26
@acczibit posts a Ned Flanders version of the chart, one of the earliest exploitable edits.
2021-04-27
IFunny user Dongerill posts a chess-themed edit about losing matches.
2021-04-28
@gamewatchtoday posts an Overwatch version, and Redditor Prestigious_Leg_5179 cross-posts a Dota 2 edit to r/DotA2.
How to Use This Meme
A typical edit keeps the stressor box the same across both rows and only rewrites the middle thought and final outcome. Common conventions include swapping 'Depression' for a fandom-specific disaster, like 'Uninstall game,' and writing a healthy-sounding reframe in the second row that is still obviously in denial about the original problem.
Frequently Asked Questions
References (6)
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6