
Body Building Forum "Days In A Week" Dispute
Published October 17, 2026
On May 17, 2008, BodyBuilding.com forum user m1ndless asked whether a "full body workout every other day" was effective, and the resulting thread spiraled into a five-page argument over whether "every other day" meant three workouts per week or four. The dispute became a classic resurface post, hitting r/funny in 2015 for over 14,000 upvotes and Twitter in 2023 for over 30,000 likes.
Overview
Humor in the thread sits in watching adult men on a fitness forum lose composure over elementary arithmetic. Users produced calendars, counted days in text form and accused each other of innumeracy, all while refusing to concede that "every other day" produces 3.5 workouts on average and either 3 or 4 in any given calendar week1. Posters quote the thread or screenshot its heated exchanges instead of remixing it into image macros, with the appeal being specific lines over a visual template4.
Resurface posts typically link straight to the original thread or share captures of the most heated exchanges, often paired with a mock caption about bodybuilders discovering mathematics2. Fans tend to single out individual replies, like the ones highlighted in the 2015 Reddit comments by /u/Cromar and /u/75elky, as personal favorites2.
Gallery
Origin & Background
How It Spread
Timeline
2008-05-17
Forum user m1ndless starts the thread "Full Body Workout Every Other Day?" on BodyBuilding.com; user "all pro" replies and the days-per-week argument begins.
2008-05
Thread extends over five pages of name-calling and math debate between users including "Josh" and "steviekm3."
2015-01-04
Redditor @bendigedigdyl links the thread in r/funny; the post collects over 14,000 upvotes.
2023-06-19
Twitter user @ScottWamplerRIP posts about the dispute, gathering over 30,000 likes within a day.
How to Use This Meme
Posters typically link the original 2008 forum thread or share screenshots of the most heated math arguments when a current online disagreement reaches similar levels of confident wrongness. The format is reference-based, so no image template is involved, just a nod to the source thread and sometimes a quoted line from one of the five pages2.
Frequently Asked Questions
References (4)
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4